COPYRIGHT

Senator Vows to Topple Anti-Piracy Bill with StopCensorship.org

Nov 29, 2011 10:01 am | PC World
Senator Ron Wyden threatens filibuster to stop the Stop Online Piracy Act.

by Sarah Jacobsson Purewal

Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, is calling on the public to help fight two Internet censorship bills, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), and the Protect IP Act (PIPA). Wyden is also threatening to filibuster the legislation if it comes up for a vote.

Wyden claims both bills will do damage to the economy and restrict free speech.

The Protect IP Act is a piece of anti-piracy legislation that, if passed, will allow theU.S. Department of Justice to seek court orders that will require Internet service providers to shut down websites accused of copyright infringement.

PIPA is the Senate version of the anti-piracy bill, and was introduced in May 2011, while SOPA is the "corrected" House version, and was introduced at the end of October. Among other things "corrected" in SOPA, there's a new provision that makes posting YouTube videos with copyrighted music--even if it's playing in the background--a felony.

[RELATED: The US Stop Online Piracy Act: A Primer]

The Stop Online Piracy Act, if passed, would allow the U.S. Department of Justice (and other copyright holders) to seek court orders that will require online ad networks, payment processors (such as Visa and PayPal), and other organizations to block payments to websites and services accused of copyright infringement.

Wyden's team, working with activist group Demand Progress, has set up a website--StopCensorship.org--where people can fill out a form to urge lawmakers to oppose the censorship legislation. People who do not support SOPA and PIPA can also ask Wyden to read their names during the filibuster.

"Bills like PIPA and SOPA will do lasting damage to one of the fastest growing, job-creating sectors of our economy: the Internet," Wyden says in a YouTube video. "The at-all-costs approach that these bills take to protect the intellectual property sacrifices cyber-security while restricting free speech and innovation."